ArticleMicromachines2024
A Novel Microfluidic Platform for Personalized Anticancer Drug Screening Through Image Analysis.
Article in Micromachines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Microfluidic Chip Technology for Laboratory Medicine: Innovations and Artificial Intelligence Integration.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Mechano-Organ-on-Chip for Cancer Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- From Spheroids to Tumor-on-a-Chip for Cancer Modeling and Therapeutic Testing.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Advancement in Scaffold-Based 3D Cell Culture Models for Osteosarcoma Drug Screening.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Review
- Rapid Microfluidic Ion-Exchange Optode System for Point-of-Care Determination of Sodium Concentration in Serum.Biosensors · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The advancement of personalized treatments in oncology has garnered increasing attention, particularly for rare and aggressive cancer with low survival rates like the bone tumors osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma. This study introduces a novel PDMS-agarose microfluidic device tailored for generating patient-derived tumor spheroids and serving as a reliable tool for personalized drug screening. Using this platform in tandem with a custom imaging index, we evaluated the impact of the anticancer agent doxorubicin on spheroids from both tumor types. The device produces 20 spheroids, each around 300 µm in diameter, within a 24 h timeframe, facilitating assessments of characteristics and reproducibility. Following spheroid generation, we measured patient-derived spheroid diameters in bright-field images, calcein AM-positive areas/volume, and the binary fraction area, a metric analyzing fluorescence intensity. By employing a specially developed equation that combines viability signal extension and intensity, we observed a substantial decrease in spheroid viability of around 75% for both sarcomas at the highest dosage (10 µM). Osteosarcoma spheroids exhibited greater sensitivity to doxorubicin than chondrosarcoma spheroids within 48 h. This approach provides a reliable in vitro model for aggressive sarcomas, representing a personalized approach for drug screening that could lead to more effective cancer treatments tailored to individual patients, despite some implementation challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.