ArticleMicromachines2024
Near-Field Direct Writing Based on Piezoelectric Micromotion for the Programmable Manufacturing of Serpentine Structures.
Article in Micromachines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Point-Line-Area Paradigm: 3D Printing for Next-Generation Health Monitoring Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Serpentine microstructures offer excellent physical properties, making them highly promising in applications in stretchable electronics and tissue engineering. However, existing fabrication methods, such as electrospinning and lithography, face significant challenges in producing microscale serpentine structures that are cost-effective, efficient, and controllable. These methods often struggle with achieving precise control over fiber morphology and scalability. In this study, we developed a near-field direct writing (NFDW) technique incorporating piezoelectric micromotion to enable the precise fabrication of serpentine micro-/nanofibers by incorporating micromotion control with macroscopic movement. Modifying the fiber structure allowed for adjustments to the mechanical properties, including tunable extensibility and distinct characteristics. Through the control of the frequency and amplitude of the piezoelectric signal, the printing errors were reduced to below 9.48% in the cycle length direction and 6.33% in the peak height direction. A predictive model for the geometrical extensibility of serpentine structures was derived from Legendre's incomplete elliptic integral of the second kind and incorporated an error correction factor, which significantly reduced the calculation errors in predicting geometric elongation, by 95.85%. The relationship between microstructure bending and biomimetic non-linear mechanical behavior was explored through tensile testing. By controlling the input electrical signals, highly ordered serpentine microstructures were successfully fabricated, demonstrating potential for use in biomimetic mechanical scaffolds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.