ReviewMicromachines2024
Resolution Enhancement Strategies in Photoacoustic Microscopy: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Micromachines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances and Opportunities in NIR-II Endoscopy: From Diagnosis to Therapeutic Applications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Photoacoustic Microscopy for Multiscale Biological System Visualization and Clinical Translation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Sub-Diffraction Photoacoustic Microscopy Enabled by a Novel Phase-Shifted Excitation Strategy: A Numerical Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A comprehensive review of high-performance photoacoustic microscopy systems.Photoacoustics · 2025Review
- Next-generation Nanomaterial-based phototherapeutic strategies for tumor: from NIR responsiveness to smart activation.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Review
- Photoacoustic-Integrated Multimodal Approach for Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Photoacoustic imaging has emerged as a promising modality for medical imaging since its introduction. Photoacoustic microscopy (PAM), which is based on the photoacoustic effect, combines the advantages of both optical and acoustic imaging modalities. PAM facilitates high-sensitivity, high-resolution, non-contact, and non-invasive imaging by employing optical absorption as its primary contrast mechanism. The ability of PAM to specifically image parameters such as blood oxygenation and melanin content makes it a valuable addition to the suite of modern biomedical imaging techniques. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the diverse technical approaches and methods employed by researchers to enhance the resolution of photoacoustic microscopy. Firstly, the fundamental principles of the photoacoustic effect and photoacoustic imaging will be presented. Subsequently, resolution enhancement methods for both acoustic-resolution photoacoustic microscopy (AR-PAM) and optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy (OR-PAM) will be discussed independently. Finally, the aforementioned resolution enhancement methods for photoacoustic microscopy will be critically evaluated, and the current challenges and future prospects of this technology will be summarized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.