ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Review of Clinically Assessed Molecular Fluorophores for Intraoperative Image Guided Surgery.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Depth estimation from wavelength-dependent fluorescence spread profiles across NIR-I and NIR-II.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- Progress in the Design and Clinical Application of Probes for Fluorescence-Guided Laparoscopic Surgery.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Review
- Nanotechnology-Driven Ultrasound/Photoacoustic Theranostics for Real-Time Imaging and Therapeutics.Nanotheranostics · 2026Review
- Fungal infections in focus: accelerating non-invasive imaging from preclinical insights to clinical breakthroughs.Npj imaging · 2025Review
- Fighting Cancer with Photodynamic Therapy and Nanotechnologies: Current Challenges and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The term "fluorescence" was first proposed nearly two centuries ago, yet its application in clinical medicine has a relatively brief history coming to the fore in the past decade. Nowadays, as fluorescence is gradually expanding into more medical applications, fluorescence image-guided surgery has become the new arena for this technology. It allows surgical teams to real-time visualize target tissues or anatomies intraoperatively to increase the precision of resection or preserve vital structures during open or laparoscopic surgeries. In this review, we introduce the concept of near-infrared fluorescence guided surgery, discuss the recent and ongoing clinical trials of molecular fluorophores (indocyanine green, 5-aminolevulinic acid, methylene blue, IR-dye 800CW, pafolacianine) and their surgical goals, highlight key chemical and medical factors for imaging agent optimization, deliberate challenges and potential advantages, and propose a framework for integrating this technology into routine surgical care in the near future. The notable clinical achievements of these fluorophores over the past decade strongly indicates that the future of fluorescence in surgery is bright with many more patient benefits to come.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.