Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39770009›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Review on Gallium in Coal and Coal Waste Materials: Exploring Strategies for Hydrometallurgical Metal Recovery.

Ewa Rudnik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ewa RudnikFaculty of Non-Ferrous Metals, AGH University of Krakow, Al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7827-033X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gallium, a critical and strategic material for advanced technologies, is anomalously enriched in certain coal deposits and coal by-products. Recovering gallium from solid residues generated during coal production and utilization can yield economic benefits and positive environmental gains through more efficient waste processing. This systematic literature review focuses on gallium concentrations in coal and its combustion or gasification by-products, modes of occurrence, gallium-hosting phases, and hydrometallurgical recovery methods, including pretreatment procedures that facilitate metal release from inert aluminosilicate minerals. Coal gangue, and especially fly ashes from coal combustion and gasification, are particularly promising due to their higher gallium content and recovery rates, which can exceed 90% under optimal conditions. However, the low concentrations of gallium and the high levels of impurities in the leachates require innovative and selective separation techniques, primarily involving ion exchange and adsorption. The scientific literature review revealed that coal, bottom ash, and coarse slag have not yet been evaluated for gallium recovery, even though the wastes can contain higher gallium levels than the original material.

Indexed as

bottom ashcoalcoal ganguefly ashgalliumleachingoccurrence modeseparation

Identifiers

PMID39770009
PMCPMC11677871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.