ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Mechanical Properties of Concrete Mixes with Selectively Crushed Wind Turbine Blade: Comparison with Raw-Crushing.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) materials of wind turbine blades can be recovered and recycled by crushing, thereby solving one of the most perplexing problems facing the wind energy sector. This process yields selectively crushed wind turbine blade (SCWTB), a novel waste that is almost exclusively composed of GFRP composite fibers that can be revalued in terms of their use as a raw material in concrete production. In this research, the fresh and mechanical performance of concrete made with 1.5%, 3.0%, 4.5%, and 6.0% SCWTB is studied. Once incorporated into concrete mixes, SCWTB waste slightly reduced slumps due to the large specific surface area of the fibers, and the stitching effect of the fibers on mechanical behavior was generally adequate, as scanning electron microscopy demonstrated good fiber adhesion within the cementitious matrix. Thus, despite the increase in the content of water and plasticizers when adding this waste to preserve workability, the compressive strength only decreased in the long term with the addition of 6.0% SCWTB, a value of 45 MPa always being reached at 28 days; Poisson's coefficient remained constant from 3.0% SCWTB; splitting tensile strength was maintained at around 4.7 MPa up to additions of 3.0% SCWTB; and the flexural strength of mixes containing 6.0% and 1.5% SCWTB was statistically equal, with a value near 6.1 MPa. Furthermore, all mechanical properties of the concrete except for flexural strength were improved with additions of SCWTB compared to raw crushed wind turbine blade, which apart from GFRP composite fibers contains approximately spherical polymer and balsa wood particles. Flexural strength was conditioned by the proportion of fibers, their dimensions, and their strength, which were almost identical for both waste types. SCWTB would be preferable for applications in which compression stresses predominate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.