ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Prediction of Bandgap in Lithium-Ion Battery Materials Based on Explainable Boosting Machine Learning Techniques.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prediction of Bandgap and Key Feature Analysis of Lead-Free Double Perovskite Oxides Based on Deep Learning.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The bandgap is a critical factor influencing the energy density of batteries and a key physical quantity that determines the semiconducting behavior of materials. To further improve the prediction accuracy of the bandgap in silicon oxide lithium-ion battery materials, a boosting machine learning model was established to predict the material's bandgap. The optimal model, AdaBoost, was selected, and the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to quantitatively analyze the importance of different input features in relation to the model's prediction accuracy. It was found that AdaBoost performed exceptionally well in terms of prediction accuracy, ranking as the best among five predictive models. Using the SHAP method to interpret the AdaBoost model, it was discovered that there is a significant positive correlation between the energy of the conduction band minimum (cbm) of silicon oxides and the bandgap, with the bandgap size showing an increasing trend as the cbm rises. Additionally, the study revealed a strong negative correlation between the Fermi level of silicon oxides and the bandgap, with the bandgap expanding as the Fermi level decreases. This research demonstrates that boosting-type machine learning models perform superiorly in predicting the bandgap of silicon oxide materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.