ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
The Influence of Insert Mounting Errors on the Surface Roughness of 1.0503 Steel in Face Milling.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article looked at how insert mounting errors affect the cutting tool performance in the face milling of 1.0503 steel. This study was conducted for 490-050Q22-08M inserts mounted in a Sandvik Coromant 490-050Q22-08M CoroMill cutter attached to an AVIA VMC 800 vertical milling center. A 3D geometrical model of the cutter was developed to determine the engagement of the particular inserts in the material removal process at different feeds per tooth. The test results showed that, at feeds ranging from 0.02 mm/tooth to 0.06 mm/tooth, only three out of five inserts took part in the face milling process, while at feeds higher than 0.12 mm/tooth, all the inserts mounted in the cutter body were engaged. The relative displacements in the tool-workpiece system were measured along the axis of rotation of the tool using a Renishaw XL-80 laser interferometer. The vibration signals recorded during cutting confirmed that there was a clear relationship between the number of inserts engaged in the process and the root mean square, the arithmetic mean, and the DC component. Multiple 2D scans of the face milled surface to measure parameters Ra and Rt helped determine the feed range where the cutting process was stable. The conducted studies allowed for the identification of optimal operating ranges for a tool with parameterized errors in the mounting of inserts within the tool body. The influence of these mounting errors, in correlation with the feed per tooth, on the surface roughness of 1.0503 steel was presented and compared with five other materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.