ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Enhanced Gaussian Process Model for Predicting Compressive Strength of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC).
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) is widely used in engineering due to its exceptional mechanical properties, particularly compressive strength. Accurate prediction of the compressive strength is critical for optimizing mix proportions but remains challenging due to data dispersion, limited data availability, and complex material interactions. This study enhances the Gaussian Process (GP) model to address these challenges by incorporating Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) and Kalman Filtering and Smoothing (KF/KS). SVD improves data quality by extracting critical features, while KF/KS reduces data dispersion and align prediction with physical laws. The enhanced GP model predicts compressive strength with improved accuracy and quantifies uncertainty, offering significant advantages over traditional methods. The results demonstrate that the enhanced GP model outperforms other models, including artificial neural networks (ANN) and regression models, in terms of reliability and interpretability. This approach provides a robust tool for optimizing UHPC mix designs, reducing experimental costs, and ensuring structural performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.