ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Mechanical Behaviour and Microstructural Analysis of Earthen Materials Reinforced with Intensive Agricultural By-Products and Binders.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sustainable Soil Reinforcement by Maximizing Geotechnical Performance with Rice Husk Ash in Subgrade Layers.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern construction is largely dependent on steel and concrete, with natural materials such as earth being significantly underutilised. Despite its sustainability and accessibility, earth is not being used to its full potential in developed countries. This study explores innovative building materials using Alhambra Formation soil (Granada, Spain) reinforced with difficult-to-recycle agricultural waste: polypropylene fibres contaminated with organic matter and leachates. Fibres were added at a ratio between 0.20 and 0.80% of the soil mass, leachates at a ratio between 4.25 and 8.50%, and lime was incorporated at 2.00% and 4.00% for specimens with higher residue content. Physico-mechanical properties, including uniaxial compressive strength and longitudinal strain, were analysed together with the microstructure. The results showed that polypropylene fibres, in comparison to the use of leachates, improved compressive strength and ductility, reaching a compressive strength of 1.76 MPa with a fibre content of 0.40%. On the other hand, this value is 7.4% lower than the reference sample without additives. The fibre-reinforced samples showed a higher porosity compared to the samples with leachates or without additives. This approach highlights the potential of agricultural waste for the development of sustainable construction materials, offering enhancements in the strength and ductility of reinforced soils.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.