Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39769681›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Comparison of the Finite Element Method and Rigid Finite Element Method During Dynamic Calculations of Steel-Concrete Composite Beams Based on Experimental Results.

Małgorzata Abramowicz, Agnieszka Pełka-Sawenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Małgorzata AbramowiczFaculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Al. Piastów 17, 70-310 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4533-6953
Agnieszka Pełka-SawenkoFaculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Al. Piastów 17, 70-310 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5011-0767

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic analysis of structures is a key challenge in structural engineering, especially in choosing effective and accurate numerical methods. Steel-concrete composite structures, commonly used in bridges and floors, require calculations of dynamic parameters to ensure safety and comfort. Few studies compare the effectiveness of the finite element method (FEM) and the rigid finite element method (RFEM) in the dynamic analysis of such structures. This study fills this gap by comparing the methods using experimental results. FEM and RFEM models were developed using Abaqus, Python, and Matlab. The main parameters were identified, i.e., the Young's modulus of the concrete slab (E

Indexed as

3D finite element model (FEM)3D rigid finite element model (RFEM)composite beamdynamic testmodal parameters

Identifiers

PMID39769681
PMCPMC11728345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.