ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Effects of Building Orientation and Raster Angle on the Mechanical Properties of Selected Materials Used in FFF Techniques.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simulation- and Metamodel-Based Multi-Objective Optimization for Sustainable Building Retrofit Across Climatic Conditions.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Influence of Infill Density on the Fatigue Performance of FDM-Manufactured Orthopaedic Plates.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Metaheuristic-Driven Ensemble Learning for Robust Fracture Energy Prediction in FDM-Fabricated PLA Components.Polymers · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in the development of additive manufacturing materials (AM) and the low availability of studies on the impact response of AM specimens are the main reasons for this paper. Therefore, the influence of building orientation (vertical and horizontal) and the angle of the raster (15°/-75°, 30°/-60°, 45°/-45°, and 0°/90°) on the tensile and impact strength of AM specimens was investigated. The polylactic acid (PLA)-PolyMax, Mediflex and acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) filaments were chosen to provide a comprehensive characterization of AM materials with versatile mechanical properties. The experimental results of this study show that the tensile strength and toughness of PolyMax PLA specimens are comparable to ABS specimens, while Mediflex samples are characterized by their higher toughness, but lower impact force needed to break the samples. The Mediflex Charpy fracture surfaces exhibit a ductile character compared to those of brittle ABS and PLA. Furthermore, fracture surface morphology shows the allocation of voids, which helps us to understand differences in mechanical properties, and allows one to properly interpret the results of the geometrical accuracy of AM specimens with various printing settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.