Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39769628›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Assessment of the Influence of the Life Cycle of Solar Power Plant Materials and Components on Ecosystem Quality.

Patryk Leda, Grzegorz Szala, Izabela Piasecka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Patryk LedaFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechatronics, Kazimierz Wielki University, Mikołaja Kopernika 1, 85-074 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0009-0005-7466-6192
Grzegorz SzalaFaculty of Mechatronics, Kazimierz Wielki University, Mikołaja Kopernika 1, 85-074 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5398-2405
Izabela PiaseckaFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, al. Prof. S. Kaliskiego 7, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, silicon is the most often utilized material for photovoltaic cell manufacturing, as it has the potential to convert solar energy directly into electricity. The silicon used in photovoltaic solutions must be highly pure. Large amounts of power, raw materials, and fossil fuels are consumed in the production process. Post-consumer treatment of polymers, materials, and components also requires energy and matter. These processes have a significant influence on the environment. As a result, the primary purpose of this article is to evaluate the influence of a photovoltaic power plant's material and component life cycle on ecosystem quality. The research focuses on an actual photovoltaic power plant with a capacity of 2 MW located in northern Poland. According to the findings, photovoltaic modules are the part that has the most negative environmental impact, since their manufacturing requires a substantial amount of materials and energy (primarily from conventional sources). Post-consumer management, in the form of recycling after use, would provide major environmental advantages and reduce detrimental environmental consequences throughout the course of the solar power plant's full life cycle.

Indexed as

ecosystemenergyenvironmentlife cycle assessment (LCA)photovoltaic power plantReCiPe 2016renewable energy sources

Identifiers

PMID39769628
PMCPMC11676193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.