Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39769550›Full record

ArticleInsects2024

Adapting to Uncertainty: Foraging Strategies in

Igor Eloi, Waldemar Alves Silva-Neto, Wallisen Tadashi Hattori, Arrilton Araújo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Igor EloiLaboratório de Biologia Comportamental, Departamento de Fisiologia e Comportamento, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59078-970, RN, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8013-8963
Waldemar Alves Silva-NetoLaboratório de Biologia Comportamental, Departamento de Fisiologia e Comportamento, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59078-970, RN, Brazil.
Wallisen Tadashi HattoriDepartamento de Saúde Coletiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia 38405-320, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6904-0292
Arrilton AraújoLaboratório de Biologia Comportamental, Departamento de Fisiologia e Comportamento, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59078-970, RN, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4804-389X

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 2925/2010Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia 0011/2009National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 303466/2012-0National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 307418/2009-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When searching for food, animals often make decisions about where to go, how long to stay in a foraging area, and whether to return to the most recently visited spot. These decisions can be enhanced by cognitive traits and adjusted based on previous experience. In social insects, such as ants, foraging efficiency has an impact at both the individual and colony levels. The present study investigated the effect of the distance to, capture success, food size, and the reward rate on decisions of where to forage in

Indexed as

antsforaging dynamicspatch residency timesolitary foraging

Identifiers

PMID39769550
PMCPMC11676486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.