ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Empirical Comparison and Analysis of Artificial Intelligence-Based Methods for Identifying Phosphorylation Sites of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a member of the large coronavirus family with high infectivity and pathogenicity and is the primary pathogen causing the global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Phosphorylation is a major type of protein post-translational modification that plays an essential role in the process of SARS-CoV-2-host interactions. The precise identification of phosphorylation sites in host cells infected with SARS-CoV-2 will be of great importance to investigate potential antiviral responses and mechanisms and exploit novel targets for therapeutic development. Numerous computational tools have been developed on the basis of phosphoproteomic data generated by mass spectrometry-based experimental techniques, with which phosphorylation sites can be accurately ascertained across the whole SARS-CoV-2-infected proteomes. In this work, we have comprehensively reviewed several major aspects of the construction strategies and availability of these predictors, including benchmark dataset preparation, feature extraction and refinement methods, machine learning algorithms and deep learning architectures, model evaluation approaches and metrics, and publicly available web servers and packages. We have highlighted and compared the prediction performance of each tool on the independent serine/threonine (S/T) and tyrosine (Y) phosphorylation datasets and discussed the overall limitations of current existing predictors. In summary, this review would provide pertinent insights into the exploitation of new powerful phosphorylation site identification tools, facilitate the localization of more suitable target molecules for experimental verification, and contribute to the development of antiviral therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.