ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Metabolic Fluxes Using Deep Learning Based on Enzyme Variations:
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic pathway modeling, essential for understanding organism metabolism, is pivotal in predicting genetic mutation effects, drug design, and biofuel development. Enhancing these modeling techniques is crucial for achieving greater prediction accuracy and reliability. However, the limited experimental data or the complexity of the pathway makes it challenging for researchers to predict phenotypes. Deep learning (DL) is known to perform better than other Machine Learning (ML) approaches if the right conditions are met (i.e., a large database and good choice of parameters). Here, we use a knowledge-based model to massively generate synthetic data and extend a small initial dataset of experimental values. The main objective is to assess if DL can perform at least as well as other ML approaches in flux prediction, using 68,950 instances. Two processing methods are used to generate DL models: cross-validation and repeated holdout evaluation. DL models predict the metabolic fluxes with high precision and slightly outperform the best-known ML approach (the Cubist model) with a lower RMSE (≤0.01) in both cases. They also outperform the PLS model (RMSE ≥ 30). This study is the first to use DL to predict the overall flux of a metabolic pathway only from variations of enzyme concentrations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.