ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Beyond the "Dominant" and "Recessive" Patterns of Inheritance.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate whether genes with different modes of inheritance differ in the presence of promoter-enriched CGI loci. For each autosomal chromosome, the author searched for variations in the total number of diseases' phenotypes with autosomal dominant (AD) and recessive (AR) inheritance for a list of promoter-poor CGI (CGI-) and promoter-enriched CGI (CGI+) genes using the OMIM database. Then, the CGI- and CGI+ genes displaying random allelic or bi-allelic expression were examined. The author evaluated whether there was a distinct distribution of AD and AR diseases in the groups of chromosomes based on their SNP hotspot density. The same analysis was conducted for the X chromosome. The SPSS statistical package was utilized. The distribution of AD and AR diseases between CGI- and CGI+ bi-allelic genes significantly differed in autosomal chromosomes 6 and 17, which show intermediate SNP hotspot density. Additionally, a statistically significant difference was observed in AD and AR diseases in the remaining autosomal chromosomes with low SNP hotspots between their randomly allelic expressed CGI- and CGI+ genes. Specifically, AD diseases were related to CGI- genes, while AR diseases were associated with CGI+ genes. In the X chromosome, X-linked dominant (XLD) diseases were mainly found in CGI+ genes, and X-linked recessive (XLR) diseases were found in CGI- genes, regardless of the X-inactivation process. It is essential to study inheritance and classify genetic variants in a more stochastic way than the terms "Dominant" and "Recessive," and their derivatives, such as "Codominant" and "Incomplete Dominant," are applied in Mendelian and non-Mendelian inheritance. This concept may further explain the "Reduced Penetrance" and "Variable Expressivity" in certain human diseases. All the above suggests a need to reassess how genetic and epigenetic data are studied and utilized for genetic counseling or precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.