Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39769084›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Expanding Horizons of CRISPR/Cas Technology: Clinical Advancements, Therapeutic Applications, and Challenges in Gene Therapy.

Ahmad Bairqdar, Polina E Karitskaya, Grigory A Stepanov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. CRISPR/Cas Systems: Biological Basis and Genome Editing Applications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Gene editing using gamma modified PNA: HBB gene as a model.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. An engineered β-globin homology donor reveals insights into β-globin expression and betters HDR.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  10. Gene Therapy Techniques and Delivery Methods (Review).Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ahmad BairqdarInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7127-7793
Polina E KaritskayaDepartment of Natural Sciences, Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0009-0005-9235-9970
Grigory A StepanovInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3393-3192

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation 075-15-2021-1085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas technology has transformed the field of gene editing, opening new possibilities for treatment of various genetic disorders. Recent years have seen a surge in clinical trials using CRISPR-Cas-based therapies. This review examines the current landscape of CRISPR-Cas implementation in clinical trials, with data from key registries, including the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, the Chinese Clinical Trial Register, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Emphasis is placed on the mechanism of action of tested therapies, the delivery method, and the most recent findings of each clinical trial.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGenetic TherapyAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicHumansCRISPR–Casgene therapygenome editingxenotransplantation

Identifiers

PMID39769084
PMCPMC11678091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.