Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39768969›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2024

Graft Selection in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comprehensive Review of Current Trends.

Marko Ostojic, Pier Francesco Indelli, Bruno Lovrekovic, Jerome Volcarenghi, Doria Juric, Hassan Tarek Hakam, Mikhail Salzmann, Nikolai Ramadanov, Aleksandra Królikowska, Roland Becker and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marko OstojicSports Traumatology Division, Traumatology Department Draskoviceva, University Hospital "Sestre Milosrdnice", 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Pier Francesco IndelliSüdtiroler Sanitätsbetrieb, 39042 Brixen, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4752-8027
Bruno LovrekovicDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Merkur, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Jerome VolcarenghiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Helora, Site Kennedy, 7000 Mons, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1554-7688
Doria JuricDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0003-4359-7046
Hassan Tarek HakamCenter of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Brandenburg Medical School, University Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, 14770 Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
Mikhail SalzmannCenter of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Brandenburg Medical School, University Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, 14770 Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
Nikolai RamadanovCenter of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Brandenburg Medical School, University Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, 14770 Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4669-8187
Aleksandra KrólikowskaPhysiotherapy Research Laboratory, University Centre od Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6283-5500
Roland BeckerCenter of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Brandenburg Medical School, University Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, 14770 Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
Robert PrillCenter of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Brandenburg Medical School, University Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, 14770 Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4916-1206

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are common in sports and often require surgical intervention, e.g., ACL reconstruction (ACLR), aimed at restoring knee stability and enabling a return to pre-injury activity levels. The choice of graft is crucial, impacting biomechanical properties, clinical outcomes, and complication rates, and is especially important in revision surgeries after graft failure. Over the past 30 years, trends in graft selection have evolved towards more individualized approaches, considering factors such as patient activity level, prior injuries, and tissue availability. In Europe, autografts like hamstring tendon (HT), bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB), and quadriceps tendon (QT) are preferred, with the increasing use of QT grafts. This review synthesizes the current literature on graft selection and its influence on ACLR outcomes.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAutograftsHamstring TendonsHumansanterior cruciate ligament injuryanterior cruciate ligament reconstructionbone patellar tendon autograftgraft selectionhamstrings autograftindividualized approachquadriceps tendon autograft

Identifiers

PMID39768969
PMCPMC11678177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.