ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
Advancing LVAD Technology: Overcoming Challenges and Shaping the Future of Mechanical Circulatory Support.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hematologic complications and design challenges in cardiovascular devices.Communications engineering · 2026Review
- Pulsatility as a Potential Regulator of Cardiovascular Biology: Molecular, Cellular, and Hemodynamic Remodeling During Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Support and Following Heart Transplantation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Corheart 6 ultracompact magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device in an obese patient with heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- Observational
- Right ventricular failure after LVAD support: A challenging case of bridge to heart transplantation in end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2026Article
- Perioperative clinical profiles and longitudinal outcomes in patients supported by continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a comprehensive analysis of early and late follow-up data.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ventricular assist devices (VADs) invigorated the management of patients with advanced heart failure, providing a lifeline for patients awaiting transplantation or requiring long-term circulatory support. This article reviews recent advances in VAD technologies, focusing on key areas of progress to overcome existing challenges and the potential for future applications. The reduction or possible elimination of infection-prone components and the evolution to transcutaneous energy transfer systems are two main research fields to reach a new quality of life category for VADs patients. Miniaturization and enhanced biocompatibility have resulted in smaller, less invasive devices with a significantly reduced risk of complications and mortality. Advances in percutaneous ventricular assist devices have emerged, contributing to the creation of less invasive options with or without intracardiac pumps, and facilitating their use for both left and right ventricles. These devices have gained more and more features, including the use of artificial intelligence. Moreover, the possibility of long-term use of intracardiac pumps offers a potential bridge to transplantation, allowing ambulation and probably also long-term circulatory support. Despite considerable advances, challenges remain, particularly in terms of improving durability, reducing the risk of ischemic events, further refining materials, and more sophisticated control and synchronization between systems that adapt to changing physiological demands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.