Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39768548›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Coronary Artery Disease and Severe Aortic Stenosis: Contemporary Treatment Options for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Nikolaos Ktenopoulos, Antonios Karanasos, Odysseas Katsaros, Anastasios Apostolos, George Latsios, Athanasios Moulias, Michael I Papafaklis, Grigorios Tsigkas, Constantinos Tsioufis, Konstantinos Toutouzas and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Conversion to Cardiac Surgery During Elective and Urgent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nikolaos KtenopoulosFirst Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0995-7015
Antonios KaranasosDepartment of Cardiology, Patras University Hospital, 26504 Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-8052-6739
Odysseas KatsarosFirst Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7684-3245
Anastasios ApostolosFirst Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-2616-7952
George LatsiosFirst Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9133-9258
Athanasios MouliasDepartment of Cardiology, Patras University Hospital, 26504 Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0254-8657
Michael I PapafaklisDepartment of Cardiology, Patras University Hospital, 26504 Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-5646-0378
Grigorios TsigkasDepartment of Cardiology, Patras University Hospital, 26504 Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-2779-0765
Constantinos TsioufisFirst Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7636-6725
Konstantinos ToutouzasFirst Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Periklis DavlourosDepartment of Cardiology, Patras University Hospital, 26504 Patras, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 50% of individuals eligible for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have coronary artery disease (CAD). The influence of CAD, both its prevalence and severity, on post-TAVI clinical results has yielded conflicting findings. Recent research has shown positive results for the use of computed tomography angiography and functional percutaneous evaluation of coronary lesions in the pre-TAVI assessment, besides the classic coronary angiography. As we anticipate the outcomes of current randomized studies, it has become common practice to perform invasive revascularization on TAVI patients with obstructive CAD. Furthermore, there is a lack of comprehensive data about the occurrence, features, and treatment of coronary incidents after TAVI. There is also growing concern about the possible difficulties in accessing the coronary arteries in patients who need coronary angiography with or without intervention after TAVI. This review presents a comprehensive analysis of the contemporary treatment options of CAD in patients undergoing TAVI. In this context, it examines the incidence of CAD in TAVI candidates; its clinical significance; the assessment and management of CAD before, concomitant, and after the procedure, including patients' unresolved concerns; and possible future aspects.

Indexed as

aortic stenosiscardiac catheterizationcoronary artery diseaseTAVITAVRtranscatheter aortic valve intervention

Identifiers

PMID39768548
PMCPMC11728009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.