ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
Three-Dimensional Ultrasound for Physical and Virtual Fetal Heart Models: Current Status and Future Perspectives.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative Ultrasound Imaging and Artificial Intelligence in Neonatal Echocardiography: Methodological Advances, Reproducibility Challenges, and Computational Perspectives.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- The Three-Y and Trachea View (3Y + T): A Conceptual Extension of the Three-Vessel and Trachea View for Comprehensive Fetal Echocardiographic Assessment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- 3D ultrasound of fetal congenital heart disease: findings from virtual and physical models.Journal of ultrasonography · 2025Article
- Complementary role of echocardiography, karyotyping, and chromosomal microarray in congenital cardiac anomalies.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital heart defects (CHDs) are the most common congenital defect, occurring in approximately 1 in 100 live births and being a leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Of note, approximately 25% of these defects are classified as critical, requiring immediate postnatal care by pediatric cardiology and neonatal cardiac surgery teams. Consequently, early and accurate diagnosis of CHD is key to proper prenatal and postnatal monitoring in a tertiary care setting. In this scenario, fetal echocardiography is considered the gold standard imaging ultrasound method for the diagnosis of CHD. However, the availability of this examination in clinical practice remains limited due to the need for a qualified specialist in pediatric cardiology. Moreover, in light of the relatively low prevalence of CHD among at-risk populations (approximately 10%), ultrasound cardiac screening for potential cardiac anomalies during routine second-trimester obstetric ultrasound scans represents a pivotal aspect of diagnosing CHD. In order to maximize the accuracy of CHD diagnoses, the views of the ventricular outflow tract and the superior mediastinum were added to the four-chamber view of the fetal heart for routine ultrasound screening according to international guidelines. In this context, four-dimensional spatio-temporal image correlation software (STIC) was developed in the early 2000s. Some of the advantages of STIC in fetal cardiac evaluation include the enrichment of anatomical details of fetal cardiac images in the absence of the pregnant woman and the ability to send volumes for analysis by an expert in fetal cardiology by an internet link. Sequentially, new technologies have been developed, such as fetal intelligent navigation echocardiography (FINE), also known as "5D heart", in which the nine fetal cardiac views recommended during a fetal echocardiogram are automatically generated from the acquisition of a cardiac volume. Furthermore, artificial intelligence (AI) has recently emerged as a promising technological innovation, offering the potential to warn of possible cardiac anomalies and thus increase the ability of non-cardiology specialists to diagnose CHD. In the early 2010s, the advent of 3D reconstruction software combined with high-definition printers enabled the virtual and 3D physical reconstruction of the fetal heart. The 3D physical models may improve parental counseling of fetal CHD, maternal-fetal interaction in cases of blind pregnant women, and interactive discussions among multidisciplinary health teams. In addition, the 3D physical and virtual models can be an useful tool for teaching cardiovascular anatomy and to optimize surgical planning, enabling simulation rooms for surgical procedures. Therefore, in this review, the authors discuss advanced image technologies that may optimize prenatal diagnoses of CHDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.