Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39768468›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Contemporary Issues in Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: A Brief Review.

Caroline A Grace, Michael J McKay

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Caroline A GraceNorthwest Regional Hospital, Rural Clinical School, The University of Tasmania, Burnie, TAS 7320, Australia.ORCID 0009-0001-5001-4860
Michael J McKayNorthwest Regional Hospital, Rural Clinical School, The University of Tasmania, Burnie, TAS 7320, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the one of the most common cancers and causes a significant disease burden. Currently, postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) is indicated for breast cancer patients with higher risk of recurrence, such as those with positive surgical margins or high-risk breast cancer (T3 with positive lymph nodes, ≥4 positive lymph nodes or T4 disease). Whether PMRT should be used in intermediate-risk breast cancer (T3 with no positive lymph nodes or T1-2 with 1-3 positive lymph nodes) is contentious. Rates of breast reconstruction postmastectomy are increasing in countries like Australia, and PMRT usage in such settings is another area of active research. Ongoing trials are also assessing the safety and efficacy of hypofractionated PMRT, a clinical scenario now widely accepted for early-stage breast cancer. This brief review is unique in that it aims to examine three current and controversial aspects of the PMRT field (PMRT in intermediate-risk breast cancer, PMRT in conjunction with breast reconstruction and its hypofractionation). To achieve this aim, we discuss available and emerging literature and guidelines to offer insights important to the PMRT field. Current literature suggests that PMRT could play a role in improving the overall survival rate and in reducing locoregional recurrence in intermediate-risk breast cancer. In terms of recommending a timing or type of breast reconstruction best suited to the setting of PMRT, we found that individual patient preferences and circumstances need to be considered alongside a multidisciplinary approach. Research into PMRT hypofractionation safety and efficacy is ongoing and its place remains to be elucidated.

Indexed as

breast cancerbreast reconstructionhypofractionationmastectomyradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39768468
PMCPMC11728050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.