ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
Review of Supplements That Patients Commonly Report Using for Dementia.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dietary supplements are readily available over the counter in the United States and are used by the majority of older adults to address a variety of concerns and conditions. Many older adults report using dietary supplements for cognitive health-either to address memory loss or dementia or in efforts to prevent cognitive decline. Our objective for this narrative review is to summarize the available efficacy and safety data for several supplements commonly reported in our clinic as being used for symptoms of dementia. Using a validated survey instrument, we conducted a survey of patients in our tertiary referral center memory clinic population to assess for the most commonly reported supplements for cognition. In our review, we compare the strength of published medical and scientific evidence to advertising or other lay press claims made about the nine most reported supplements with the aim of providing a representation of general trends in this industry. We found little or no scientific evidence available to support the use of any of these substances to ameliorate memory loss or other cognitive symptoms. Although most appear safe in the studies conducted to date, several authors have highlighted the lack of Food and Drug Administration oversight in the supplement industry, raising concerns over unknown or undeclared contaminants in these over-the-counter products. This review will better prepare clinicians to discuss these considerations with their patients who are considering the use of dietary supplements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.