ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2024
A Short Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System-Based Description for Classification of Breast Mass Grade.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying breast masses is relevant in early cancer detection. Automatic identification using computational methods helps assist medical experts with this task. Although high values have been reported in breast mass classification from digital mammograms, most results have focused on a general benign/malignant classification. According to the BI-RADS standard, masses are associated with cancer risk by grade depending on their specific shape, margin, and density characteristics. This work presents a methodology of testing several descriptors on the INbreast dataset, finding those better related to clinical assessment. The analysis provides a description based on BI-RADS for mass classification by combining neural networks and image processing. The results show that masses associated with grades BI-RADS-2 to BI-RADS-5 can be identified, reaching a general accuracy and sensitivity of 0.88±0.07. While this initial study is limited to a single dataset, it demonstrates the possibility of generating a description for automatic classification that is directly linked to the information analyzed by medical experts in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.