Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39768326›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Neonatal Hypoglycemia and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes-An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Shivashankar Diggikar, Paula Trif, Diana Mudura, Arun Prasath, Jan Mazela, Maria Livia Ognean, Boris W Kramer, Radu Galis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Fetal size, gestational age, and cognitive performance at 5 years in term-born children: Four national cohorts' study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shivashankar DiggikarDepartment of Pediatrics, Oyster Women and Child Hospital, Bengaluru 560043, India.
Paula TrifDepartment of Neonatology, Emergency County Hospital Bihor, 410167 Oradea, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0967-9892
Diana MuduraDepartment of Neonatology, Emergency County Hospital Bihor, 410167 Oradea, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-5225-1758
Arun PrasathDepartment of Neonatology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Jan MazelaDepartment of Neonatology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9845-6759
Maria Livia OgneanFaculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University, 550024 Sibiu, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-2233-4218
Boris W KramerDepartment of Neonatology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7682-2591
Radu GalisDepartment of Neonatology, Emergency County Hospital Bihor, 410167 Oradea, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-4165-8816

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveThe effects of neonatal hypoglycemia on the developing brain are well known, resulting in poor neurological outcomes. We aimed to perform an updated meta-analysis on neonatal hypoglycemia, the severity of hypoglycemia, and the associated neurodevelopmental outcomes from infancy to adulthood.

methodsA systematic literature search was conducted from inception until March 2024, using the PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and the CENTRAL databases. Randomized/quasi-randomized trials and observational studies that evaluated at least one of the pre-specified outcomes were included. A random-effects model meta-analysis was performed to yield the pooled OR and its 95% CI for each outcome due to the expected heterogeneity in the studies. The study findings were reported as per the PRISMA guidelines. Neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI), cognitive impairment, and visual-motor or visual impairment were the primary outcomes.

resultsA total of 17 studies (19 publications) were included in the final analysis. NDI, as defined by authors, was significantly higher in early- (OR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.11-1.43) and mid-childhood (OR = 3.67; 95%CI = 1.07-12.2) in infants with neonatal hypoglycemia. 'Any cognitive impairment' was significantly more common in infants with neonatal hypoglycemia (OR = 2.12; 95%CI = 1.79-2.52). Visual-motor impairment (OR = 3.33; 95%CI = 1.14-9.72) and executive dysfunction (OR = 1.99; 95%CI = 1.36-2.91) were also more common in the hypoglycemic group. No difference in the incidence of epilepsy, motor impairment, emotional-behavioral problems, or hearing impairment were noted. Certainty of evidence was adjudged as 'low' to 'very low' for most outcomes. The severity of hypoglycemia was studied at different intervals, with NDI more common with a blood glucose interval between 20 and 34 mg/dL (1.1-1.9 mmol/L).

conclusionsLow-quality evidence from large observational studies finds a significant association with hypoglycemia in the early neonatal period and long-term neurodevelopmental problems. Additional studies with long enough follow-up are paramount to determine the cut-off concentration and to quantify the impact beyond the infancy period.

Indexed as

brain damageglucose metabolismneonatal hypoglycemianeurodevelopmentoutcomes

Identifiers

PMID39768326
PMCPMC11677687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.