ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Arrhythmias Following Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: An Unsolved Enigma.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patent Foramen Ovale: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Pathophysiology, Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Management.MedComm · 2026Review
- Reduced recurrence of atrial fibrillation after cryoballoon ablation in patients with preprocedural patent foramen ovale: a retrospective single-center observational cohort study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Long-term incidence of first hospital-recorded atrial arrhythmias and all-cause mortality after percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure: a single-centre cohort linked to Czech nationwide administrative health data.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of Patent Foramen Ovale Closure vs Medical Therapy for the Prevention of Recurrent Cryptogenic Stroke: A Systematic Review.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure has proven to be an effective method of reducing the risk of recurrent stroke in patients with embolic stroke of unknown origin (ESUS). One of the most recognized post-procedural complications is the de novo occurrence of supraventricular arrhythmias, mainly atrial fibrillation, in the first three months following PFO closure. Earlier studies reported the incidence to be around 3.4-7%; however, this percentage has risen in recent studies up to 21%. The pathogenesis behind this type of arrhythmia is complex and not clearly understood, although it seems that direct effects of the device on the atria, as well as an inflammatory response, are the two most prevalent mechanisms. Management of this complication might be challenging given the heterogenicity of patient characteristics, so an individualized approach is most wisely followed. This review aims to present the current data on the incidence, pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies behind this rather common concern in an era of increasing transcatheter interventions for PFO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.