Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39768226›Full record

ReviewCells2024

Harnessing Arsenic Derivatives and Natural Agents for Enhanced Glioblastoma Therapy.

Bo Yuan, Hidetomo Kikuchi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bo YuanLaboratory of Pharmacology, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Josai University, Keyakidai, Sakado 350-0295, Saitama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3406-258X
Hidetomo KikuchiLaboratory of Pharmacotherapy, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Josai University, Keyakidai, Sakado 350-0295, Saitama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7704-4859

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20K07136Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 24K09946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and lethal intracranial tumor in adults. Despite advances in the understanding of the molecular events responsible for disease development and progression, survival rates and mortality statistics for GBM patients have been virtually unchanged for decades and chemotherapeutic drugs used to treat GBM are limited. Arsenic derivatives, known as highly effective anticancer agents for leukemia therapy, has been demonstrated to exhibit cytocidal effects toward GBM cells by inducing cell death, cell cycle arrest, inhibition of migration/invasion, and angiogenesis. Differentiation induction of glioma stem-like cells (GSCs) and inhibition of neurosphere formation have also been attributed to the cytotoxicity of arsenic derivatives. Intriguingly, similar cytotoxic effects against GBM cells and GSCs have also been observed in natural agents such as anthocyanidins, tetrandrine, and bufadienolides. In the current review, we highlight the available data on the molecular mechanisms underlying the multifaceted anticancer activity of arsenic compounds and natural agents against cancer cells, especially focusing on GBM cells and GCSs. We also outline possible strategies for developing anticancer therapy by combining natural agents and arsenic compounds, as well as temozolomide, an alkylating agent used to treat GBM, in terms of improvement of chemotherapy sensitivity and minimization of side effects.

Indexed as

GlioblastomaAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsArsenicArsenicalsBiological ProductsBrain NeoplasmsHumansNeoplastic Stem CellsAntineoplastic AgentsArsenicArsenicalsBiological Productsanthocyanidinsarsenic disulfidearsenic trioxidebufadienolidescombination therapydarinaparsinglioblastomatemozolomidetetrandrine

Identifiers

PMID39768226
PMCPMC11674460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.