Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39768092›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A Hybrid Transformer-Convolutional Neural Network for Segmentation of Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Perihematomal Edema on Non-Contrast Head Computed Tomography (CT) with Uncertainty Quantification to Improve Confidence.

Anh T Tran, Dmitriy Desser, Tal Zeevi, Gaby Abou Karam, Fiona Dierksen, Andrea Dell'Orco, Helge Kniep, Uta Hanning, Jens Fiehler, Julia Zietz and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Anh T TranDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Dmitriy DesserDepartment of Neuroradiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4642-3063
Tal ZeeviDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Gaby Abou KaramDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-3540-7185
Fiona DierksenDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Andrea Dell'OrcoDepartment of Neuroradiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3964-8360
Helge KniepDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Uta HanningDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Jens FiehlerDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Julia ZietzDepartment of Neuroradiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Pina C SanelliDepartment of Radiology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA.
Ajay MalhotraDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9223-6640
James S DuncanDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Sanjay AnejaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5681-7528
Guido J FalconeDepartment of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6407-0302
Adnan I QureshiZeenat Qureshi Stroke Institute and Department of Neurology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Kevin N ShethDepartment of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Jawed NawabiDepartment of Neuroradiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1137-0643
Seyedmehdi PayabvashDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4628-0370

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Radiomics Signatures and Patient Outcomes in Intracerebral HemorrhageK23NS118056 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Seyedmehdi Payabvash · 2021 to 2026
$780k
Doris Duke Charitable Foundation 2020097NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIH HHS K23NS118056NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS118056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and perihematomal edema (PHE) are key imaging markers of primary and secondary brain injury in hemorrhagic stroke. Accurate segmentation and quantification of ICH and PHE can help with prognostication and guide treatment planning. In this study, we combined Swin-Unet Transformers with nnU-NETv2 convolutional network for segmentation of ICH and PHE on non-contrast head CTs. We also applied test-time data augmentations to assess individual-level prediction uncertainty, ensuring high confidence in prediction. The model was trained on 1782 CT scans from a multicentric trial and tested in two independent datasets from Yale (n = 396) and University of Berlin Charité Hospital and University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (n = 943). Model performance was evaluated with the Dice coefficient and Volume Similarity (VS). Our dual Swin-nnUNET model achieved a median (95% confidence interval) Dice = 0.93 (0.90-0.95) and VS = 0.97 (0.95-0.98) for ICH, and Dice = 0.70 (0.64-0.75) and VS = 0.87 (0.80-0.93) for PHE segmentation in the Yale cohort. Dice = 0.86 (0.80-0.90) and VS = 0.91 (0.85-0.95) for ICH and Dice = 0.65 (0.56-0.70) and VS = 0.86 (0.77-0.93) for PHE segmentation in the Berlin/Hamburg-Eppendorf cohort. Prediction uncertainty was associated with lower segmentation accuracy, smaller ICH/PHE volumes, and infratentorial location. Our results highlight the benefits of a dual transformer-convolutional neural network architecture for ICH/PHE segmentation and test-time augmentation for uncertainty quantification.

Indexed as

intracerebral hemorrhageperihematomal edemasegmentation

Identifiers

PMID39768092
PMCPMC11672977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.