ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Evaluation of a Semi-Automated Ultrasound Guidance System for Central Vascular Access.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- User validation of an AI-assisted ultrasound guidance system for rapid vascular access.European radiology · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Based Tracking of Neurovascular Features Toward Semi-Automated Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Nerve Blocks by Non-Specialists.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hemorrhage remains a leading cause of death in both military and civilian trauma settings. Oftentimes, the control and treatment of hemorrhage requires central vascular access and well-trained medical personnel. Automated technology is being developed that can lower the skill threshold for life-saving interventions. Here, we conduct independent evaluation testing of one such device, the Vu-Path™ Ultrasound Guidance system, or Vu-Path™. The device was designed to simplify needle insertion using a needle holder that ensures the needle is within the ultrasound field of view during its insertion into tissue, along with guidance lines shown on the user interface. We evaluated the performance of this device in a range of laboratory, animal, and human testing platforms. Overall, the device had a high success rate, achieving an 83% insertion accuracy in live animal testing across both normal and hypotensive blood pressures. Vu-Path™ was faster than manual, ultrasound-guided needle insertion and was nearly 1.5 times quicker for arterial and 2.3 times quicker for venous access. Human usability feedback highlighted that 80% of the participants would use this device for central line placement. Study users noted that the guidance lines and small form factor were useful design features. However, issues were raised regarding the needle insertion angle being too steep, with potential positioning challenges as the needle remains fixed to the ultrasound probe. Regardless, 75% of the participants believed that personnel with any level of clinical background could use the device for central vascular access. Overall, Vu-Path™ performed well across a range of testing situations, and potential design improvements were noted. With adjustments to the device, central vascular access can be made more accessible on battlefields in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.