ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Gender Differences in the Dynamics and Kinematics of Running and Their Dependence on Footwear.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A New Method and Set of Parameters for Evaluating the Cushioning Effect of Shoe Heels, Revealing the Inadvertent Design of Running Shoes.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Alterations in pelvic kinematics with speed, incline, and fatigue in female runners.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies on gender differences in running biomechanics have predominantly been limited to joint angles and have not investigated a potential influence of footwear condition. This study shall contribute to closing this gap. Lower body biomechanics of 37 recreational runners (19 f, 18 m) were analysed for eight footwear and two running speed conditions. Presenting the effect size Cliff's Delta enabled the interpretation of gender differences across a variety of variables and conditions. Known gender differences such as a larger range of hip movement in female runners were confirmed. Further previously undiscovered gender differences in running biomechanics were identified. In women, the knee extensors are less involved in joint work. Instead, compared to men, the supinators contribute more to deceleration and the hip abductors to acceleration. In addition to differences in extent, women also show a temporal delay within certain variables. For the foot, ankle and shank, as well as for the distribution of joint work, gender differences were found to be dependent on footwear condition, while sagittal pelvis and non-sagittal hip and thigh kinematics are rather consistent. On average, smaller gender differences were found for an individual compared to a uniform running speed. Future studies on gender differences should consider the influence of footwear and running speed and should provide an accurate description of the footwear condition used. The findings of this study could be used for the development of gender-specific running shoes and sports and medical products and provide a foundation for the application of smart wearable devices in gender-specific training and rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.