ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Multi-Exoskeleton Performance Evaluation: Integrated Muscle Energy Indices to Determine the Quality and Quantity of Assistance.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Causally Inspired Counterfactual Evaluation Framework for Wearable Assistive Robots.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effects on muscular activity and usability of soft active versus rigid passive back exoskeleton during symmetric lifting tasks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- From the idea to the user: a pragmatic multifaceted approach to testing occupational exoskeletons.Wearable technologies · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The assessment of realistic work tasks is a critical aspect of introducing exoskeletons to work environments. However, as the experimental task's complexity increases, the analysis of muscle activity becomes increasingly challenging. Thus, it is essential to use metrics that adequately represent the physical human-exoskeleton interaction (pHEI). Muscle activity analysis is usually reduced to a comparison of point values (average or maximum muscle contraction), neglecting the signals' trend. Metrics based on single values, however, lack information about the dynamism of the task and its duration. Their meaning can be uncertain, especially when analyzing complex movements or temporally extended activities, and it is reduced to an overall assessment of the interaction on the whole task. This work proposes a method based on integrated EMGs (iEMGs) to evaluate the pHEI by considering task dynamism, temporal duration, and the neural energy associated with muscle activity. The resulting signal highlights the task phases in which the exoskeleton reduces or increases the effort required to accomplish the task, allowing the calculation of specific indices that quantify the energy exchange in terms of assistance (AII), resistance (RII), and overall interaction (OII). The method provides an analysis tool that enables developers and controller designers to receive insights into the exoskeleton performances and the quality of the user-robot interaction. The application of this method is provided for passive and two active back support exoskeletons: the Laevo, XoTrunk, and StreamEXO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.