ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Architecture-Aware Augmentation: A Hybrid Deep Learning and Machine Learning Approach for Enhanced Parkinson's Disease Detection.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pilot Study Employing a Machine Learning Approach as a Potential Method for Predicting Parkinson's Disease Using Voice as a Digital Biomarker and the SHAP Approach for Feature Engineering.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder affecting millions worldwide. Early detection is crucial for improving patient outcomes. Spiral drawing analysis has emerged as a non-invasive tool to detect early motor impairments associated with PD. This study examines the performance of hybrid deep learning and machine learning models in detecting PD using spiral drawings, with a focus on the impact of data augmentation techniques. We compare the accuracy of Vision Transformer (ViT) with K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) with Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Residual Neural Networks (ResNet-50) with Logistic Regression, evaluating their performance on both augmented and non-augmented data. Our findings reveal that ViT with KNN, initially achieving 96.77% accuracy on unaugmented data, experienced a notable decline across all augmentation techniques, suggesting it relies heavily on global patterns in spiral drawings. In contrast, ResNet-50 with Logistic Regression showed consistent improvement with data augmentation, reaching 93.55% accuracy when rotation and flipping techniques were applied. These results highlight that hybrid models respond differently to augmentation, and careful selection of augmentation strategies is necessary for optimizing model performance. Our study provides important insights into the development of reliable diagnostic tools for early PD detection, emphasizing the need for appropriate augmentation techniques in medical image analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.