ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Breast Tumor Detection and Diagnosis Using an Improved Faster R-CNN in DCE-MRI.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Delirium Prediction Model for Post-Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Scoping Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Information Geometry and Manifold Learning: A Novel Framework for Analyzing Alzheimer's Disease MRI Data.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Precision enhancement in wireless capsule endoscopy: a novel transformer-based approach for real-time video object detection.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
AI-based breast cancer detection can improve the sensitivity and specificity of detection, especially for small lesions, which has clinical value in realizing early detection and treatment so as to reduce mortality. The two-stage detection network performs well; however, it adopts an imprecise ROI during classification, which can easily include surrounding tumor tissues. Additionally, fuzzy noise is a significant contributor to false positives. We adopted Faster RCNN as the architecture, introduced ROI aligning to minimize quantization errors and feature pyramid network (FPN) to extract different resolution features, added a bounding box quadratic regression feature map extraction network and three convolutional layers to reduce interference from tumor surrounding information, and extracted more accurate and deeper feature maps. Our approach outperformed Faster R-CNN, Mask R-CNN, and YOLOv9 in breast cancer detection across 485 internal cases. We achieved superior performance in mAP, sensitivity, and false positive rate ((0.752, 0.950, 0.133) vs. (0.711, 0.950, 0.200) vs. (0.718, 0.880, 0.120) vs. (0.658, 0.680, 405)), which represents a 38.5% reduction in false positives compared to manual detection. Additionally, in a public dataset of 220 cases, our model also demonstrated the best performance. It showed improved sensitivity and specificity, effectively assisting doctors in diagnosing cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.