ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Advances in Corneal Diagnostics Using Machine Learning.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper provides comprehensive insights into the cornea and its diseases, with a particular focus on keratoconus. This paper explores the cornea's function in maintaining ocular health, detailing its anatomy, pathological conditions, and the latest developments in diagnostic techniques. Keratoconus is discussed extensively, covering its subtypes, etiology, clinical manifestations, and the application of the Q-value for quantification. Several diagnostic techniques, such as corneal topography, are crucial points of discussion. This paper also examines the use of machine learning models, specifically Decision Tree and Nearest Neighbor Analysis, which enhance the accuracy of diagnosing based on topographical corneal parameters from corneal topography. These models provide valuable insights into disease progression and aid in clinical decision making. Integrating these technologies in medical research opens promising avenues for enhanced disease detection. Our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of Decision Tree and Nearest Neighbor Analysis in classifying and predicting conditions based on corneal parameters. The Decision Tree achieved classification accuracy of 62% for training and 65.7% for testing, while Nearest Neighbor Analysis yielded 65.4% for training and 62.6% for holdout samples. These models offer valuable insights into the progression and severity of keratoconus, aiding clinicians in treatment and management decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.