Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39768011›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Joint Screening for Ultra-High Dimensional Multi-Omics Data.

Ulrich Kemmo Tsafack, Chien-Wei Lin, Kwang Woo Ahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ulrich Kemmo TsafackDivision of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW), Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-5997-5440
Chien-Wei LinDivision of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW), Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4023-7339
Kwang Woo AhnDivision of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW), Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4567-8037

Funding

Data Resource for Analyzing Blood &Marrow TransplantsU24CA076518 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Amy M Moskop, Bronwen Shaw · 1998 to 2026
$105.2M
RAT GENOME DATABASER01HL064541 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI ANNE E. KWITEK · 1999 to 2026
$50.0M
National Heart Lung and Blood Institute 5R01HL064541-25NCI NIH HHS U24 CA076518NCI NIH HHS U24CA076518NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL064541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigators often face ultra-high dimensional multi-omics data, where identifying significant genes and omics within a gene is of interest. In such data, each gene forms a group consisting of its multiple omics. Moreover, some genes may also be highly correlated. This leads to a tri-level hierarchical structured data: the cluster level, which is the group of correlated genes, the subgroup level, which is the group of omics of the same gene, and the individual level, which consists of omics. Screening is widely used to remove unimportant variables so that the number of remaining variables becomes smaller than the sample size. Penalized regression with the remaining variables after performing screening is then used to identify important variables. To screen unimportant genes, we propose to cluster genes and conduct screening. We show that the proposed screening method possesses the sure screening property. Extensive simulations show that the proposed screening method outperforms competing methods. We apply the proposed variable selection method to the TCGA breast cancer dataset to identify genes and omics that are related to breast cancer.

Indexed as

multi-omicsscreeningultra-high dimensional datavariable selection

Identifiers

PMID39768011
PMCPMC11727280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.