Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39768007›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Data Flow-Based Strategies to Improve the Interpretation and Understanding of Machine Learning Models.

Michael Brimacombe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michael BrimacombeCT Children's, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, 282 Washington Ave, Hartford, CT 06106, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3276-9071

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data flow-based strategies that seek to improve the understanding of A.I.-based results are examined here by carefully curating and monitoring the flow of data into, for example, artificial neural networks and random forest supervised models. While these models possess structures and related fitting procedures that are highly complex, careful restriction of the data being utilized by these models can provide insight into how they interpret data structures and associated variables sets and how they are affected by differing levels of variation in the data. The goal is improving our understanding of A.I.-based supervised modeling-based results and their stability across different data sources. Some guidelines are suggested for such first-stage adjustments and related data issues.

Indexed as

A.I. artificial neural networksdata characteristicsdata flowdata qualityfirst-stage data adjustmentsorthogonalizationpredictionresidual analysisunderstanding

Identifiers

PMID39768007
PMCPMC11727020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.