Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39768000›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Influence of the Initial Guess on the Estimation of Knee Ligament Parameters via Optimization Procedures.

Ilias Theodorakos, Michael Skipper Andersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Validating subject-specific knee models fromFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ilias TheodorakosDepartment of Materials and Production, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7558-7286
Michael Skipper AndersenDepartment of Materials and Production, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8275-9472

Funding

Independent Research Fund Denmark 0136-00090BIndependent Research Fund Denmark 1032-00036BNovo Nordisk Foundation NNF21OC0065373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimization procedures provide ligament parameters by minimizing the difference between experimental measurements and computational simulations. Literature values are used as initial guesses of ligament parameters for these optimization procedures. However, it remains unknown how these values affect the estimation of ligament parameters. This study evaluates the effects of the initial guess on estimations of ligament parameters. A synthetic data set was generated using a subject-specific knee computational model, reference ligament parameters and simulated laxity tests. Subsequently, ligament parameters were estimated using an optimization routine and four different initial guesses. The distance of these initial guesses from their true values ranged from 0 to 3.5 kN and from 0 to 3.6% for the stiffness and reference strains, respectively. The optimized ligament parameters had an average absolute mean error ranging from 0.15 (0.09) kN and 0.08 (0.04)% to 3.67 (2.46) kN and 1.25 (0.76)%, while the kinematic error remained below 1 mm and 1.2° for all conditions. Our results showed that the estimations of the ligament parameters worsened as the initial guesses moved farther away from their true values. Moreover, the optimization procedure resulted in suboptimal ligament parameters that provided similar behavior to the true laxity behavior, which is an alarming finding that should be further investigated.

Indexed as

force-dependent kinematicsknee jointlaxityligament parametersmultibody modelingoptimization

Identifiers

PMID39768000
PMCPMC11727144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.