ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Influence of the Initial Guess on the Estimation of Knee Ligament Parameters via Optimization Procedures.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deciphering the "Art" in Modeling and Simulation of the Knee Joint: Model Benchmarking.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2026Article
- Validating subject-specific knee models fromFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optimization procedures provide ligament parameters by minimizing the difference between experimental measurements and computational simulations. Literature values are used as initial guesses of ligament parameters for these optimization procedures. However, it remains unknown how these values affect the estimation of ligament parameters. This study evaluates the effects of the initial guess on estimations of ligament parameters. A synthetic data set was generated using a subject-specific knee computational model, reference ligament parameters and simulated laxity tests. Subsequently, ligament parameters were estimated using an optimization routine and four different initial guesses. The distance of these initial guesses from their true values ranged from 0 to 3.5 kN and from 0 to 3.6% for the stiffness and reference strains, respectively. The optimized ligament parameters had an average absolute mean error ranging from 0.15 (0.09) kN and 0.08 (0.04)% to 3.67 (2.46) kN and 1.25 (0.76)%, while the kinematic error remained below 1 mm and 1.2° for all conditions. Our results showed that the estimations of the ligament parameters worsened as the initial guesses moved farther away from their true values. Moreover, the optimization procedure resulted in suboptimal ligament parameters that provided similar behavior to the true laxity behavior, which is an alarming finding that should be further investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.