Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39767826›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2024

Passive Immunisation in the Treatment of Infectious Diseases Related to Highly Potent Bacterial Toxins.

Marta Prygiel, Ewa Mosiej, Karol Wdowiak, Aleksandra Anna Zasada

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. [Use of vaccines to prevent the development of bacterial resistance].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marta PrygielNational Institute of Public Health NIH-National Research Institute, Chocimska 24, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9856-0767
Ewa MosiejNational Institute of Public Health NIH-National Research Institute, Chocimska 24, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5513-0775
Karol WdowiakNational Institute of Public Health NIH-National Research Institute, Chocimska 24, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2819-5925
Aleksandra Anna ZasadaNational Institute of Public Health NIH-National Research Institute, Chocimska 24, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2774-0941

Funding

National Institute of Public Health NIH - National Research Institute BS-1/2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of microbial toxins as the primary factors responsible for disease manifestations and the discovery that these toxins could be neutralised by antitoxins are linked to the birth of immunology. In the late 19th century, the serum or plasma of animals or patients who had recovered from infectious diseases or who had been immunised with a relevant antigen began to be used to treat or prevent infections. Before the advent of widespread vaccination campaigns, antitoxins played a key role in the treatment and prevention of diseases such as diphtheria and tetanus. A significant reduction in mortality following the introduction of antitoxins confirmed their efficacy. Serum therapy remains an important measure for post-exposure prophylaxis and for the treatment of unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated patients. For the botulinum toxin, antitoxin therapy continues to be the sole available treatment. The manuscript contains a summary of the most important information on the passive immunoprophylaxis used in the treatment of diphtheria, tetanus, and botulism, all representing diseases in which symptoms are driven by the activity of highly potent bacterial toxins.

Indexed as

antitoxinsbotulismdiphtheriaepassive immunisationtetanustoxins

Identifiers

PMID39767826
PMCPMC11673946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.