Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39767716›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2024

Updates on Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cells in Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Khalil Saleh, Nadine Khalife, Ahmadreza Arbab, Rita Khoury, Claude Chahine, Rebecca Ibrahim, Zamzam Tikriti, Nohad Masri, Mohamad Hachem, Axel Le Cesne

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Khalil SalehInternational Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 94800 Villejuif, France.
Nadine KhalifeDepartment of Head and Neck, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 94800 Villejuif, France.
Ahmadreza ArbabDepartment of Biopathology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 94800 Villejuif, France.
Rita KhouryInternational Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 94800 Villejuif, France.
Claude ChahineInternational Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 94800 Villejuif, France.
Rebecca IbrahimInternational Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 94800 Villejuif, France.
Zamzam TikritiInternational Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 94800 Villejuif, France.
Nohad MasriInternational Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 94800 Villejuif, France.
Mohamad HachemInternational Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 94800 Villejuif, France.ORCID 0009-0008-3928-6161
Axel Le CesneInternational Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 94800 Villejuif, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CD19-targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells have changed the treatment paradigm of patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Three CAR T-cells were approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for patients with relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) LBCL in the third-line setting: tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), and lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), with an ORR ranging from 58% to 82%. More recently, axi-cel and liso-cel were approved as second-line treatments for patients with R/R disease up to 12 months after the completion of first-line chemo-immunotherapy. The safety profile was acceptable with cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome being the two most frequent acute adverse events. Potential long-term toxicities of CD19-targeting CAR T-cells have also been described. Overall, 30% to 40% of patients are cured with a single infusion of CAR T-cells. However, 60% to 70% of patients relapse after being treated with CAR T-cells and have a dismal prognosis. The advent of bispecific antibodies (BsAb) offers an additional treatment modality for patients with R/R LBCL. The aim of this review is to describe the clinical efficacy of the three CAR T-cells, as well as their safety profile. We also compare these three CAR T-cells in terms of their efficacy and safety profile as well as evaluating the place of CAR T-cells and BsAb in the treatment arsenal of patients with R/R LBCL.

Indexed as

axicabtagene ciloleucelCD19-targeting CAR T-cellslarge B-cell lymphomalisocabtagene maraleuceltisagenlecleucel

Identifiers

PMID39767716
PMCPMC11674015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.