Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39767699›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2024

Gut Microbial Dysbiosis and Implications in Solid Organ Transplantation.

Cathlyn K Medina, Berk Aykut

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cathlyn K MedinaDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2522-1825
Berk AykutDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8343-4258

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiome has been shown to play a significant role in solid organ transplantation, potentially influencing graft function and patient outcomes. Dysbiosis, characterized by reduced microbial diversity and an increase in pathogenic taxa, has been linked to higher incidences of allograft rejection, graft dysfunction, and post-transplant mortality. Several studies suggest that the gut microbiome might be able to serve as both a biomarker and a therapeutic target, potentially guiding personalized immunosuppressive therapies and other interventions to improve outcomes after solid organ transplantation. As summarized in this review, clinical studies have shown that specific microbial shifts correlate with adverse outcomes, including acute rejection and chronic allograft dysfunction. As research surrounding the relationship between the gut microbiome and solid organ transplant progresses, the integration of microbial analysis into clinical practice has the potential to revolutionize post-transplant care, offering new avenues to improve graft survival and patient quality of life. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the relationship between gut microbial dysbiosis and transplantation outcomes, emphasizing the impact on kidney, liver, lung, and heart transplant recipients.

Indexed as

gut microbiomemicrobial dysbiosisoutcomessolid organ transplant

Identifiers

PMID39767699
PMCPMC11673786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.