ArticleBiomedicines2024
Bone Marrow Stem Cell Population in Single- and Multiple-Level Aspiration.
Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Angiogenic and Osteogenic Strategies for Skeletal Regeneration in Aging.Current osteoporosis reports · 2026Review
- Clinical, Radiological, and Biochemical Evaluation in Orthopedics: Lessons from a Special Issue.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Optimization of Cytometry by Time-of-Flight Staining for Peripheral Blood and Bone Marrow Samples.Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBone marrow aspiration concentrate (BMAC) has garnered increasing interest due to its potential for healing musculoskeletal injuries. While the iliac crest remains a common harvest site, the aspiration technique's efficacy in offering the highest yield and prevalence of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is controversial. This study aimed to compare two different techniques of bone marrow aspiration over the anterior iliac crest from a single level versus multiple levels.
methodsAnterior iliac crests were selected in seven adult patients (aged between 31 and 59 years old). Aspiration was achieved using an 11-gauge needle (length: 100 mm; diameter: 2.3 mm) specifically manufactured for bone marrow collection (BD, Becton, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) connected to a 10 mL syringe. On one side, 4cc of bone marrow was aspirated at a single level to a depth of 7 cm without changing the needle direction. On the other side, over the same portion of the iliac crest, 1 cc of bone marrow was obtained from multiple levels of different depths during needle retrieval, maintaining a distance of 1 cm and changing the tip direction. The samples were blindly sent to the laboratory without indicating whether they came from an single level or multiple levels. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and osteoblast differentiation were analyzed and compared.
resultsIn the FACS analysis, the single level resulted in a higher population of MSCs that were positive for CD105, CD73, and CD90 and negative for CD34, compared to the multiple-level method. In the process of osteoblast differentiation, it was observed that MSCs exhibited more advanced features of enhanced osteoblastic abilities in the single-level method rather than the multiple-level method.
conclusionsA single-level aspiration technique at the anterior iliac crest may produce a high-quality bone marrow aspirate. This technique may help obtain specific populations of MSCs with the desired characteristics for use in regenerative therapies for musculoskeletal injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.