Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39767553›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

A Rapid Systematic Review Assessing the Effectiveness of Interventions to Promote Self-Management in Workers with Long-Term Health Conditions and Disabilities.

David W Maidment, Katie Clarkson, Emma V Shiel, Karina Nielsen, Jo Yarker, Fehmidah Munir

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Public and Patient Involvement and Engagement in Clinical Trials: A Multi-Perspective Mixed-Methods Evaluation of the ROWTATE Programme.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. An Interpretive Phenomenological Inquiry into Type 1 Diabetes and Work.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  7. Individual Work Attitudes and Work Ability.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David W MaidmentSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8416-519X
Katie ClarksonSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK.
Emma V ShielSchool of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7161-5596
Karina NielsenInstitute of Work Psychology, Management School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 1FL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9685-9570
Jo YarkerAffinity Health at Work, London SW12 9NW, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6360-7350
Fehmidah MunirSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5585-0243

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) NIHR206282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to synthesise evidence assessing the effectiveness of workplace-based interventions that promote self-management of multiple long-term conditions or disabilities, e.g., type I and II diabetes, asthma, musculoskeletal injury/disorder, cancer, and mental ill-health. A prospectively registered rapid systematic review was conducted. Both academic and grey literature databases were searched for papers published within the last 10 years, reflecting the most contemporary legislation and policy. The outcomes included work productivity, work engagement, self-management, work ability, quality of life, psychological wellbeing, workplace fatigue, job satisfaction, work-based attendance, work self-efficacy, and condition-specific health status. Five randomised controlled trials were included, and all assessed a chronic disease self-management programme consisting of six weekly facilitator-led group sessions. Due to the small number of studies and the variability in outcome measures employed, meta-analyses were not feasible. However, a narrative synthesis indicated that work engagement, self-management and wellbeing improved in the intervention compared to the control groups. All of the other outcomes showed mixed results. The findings highlight the need to develop less resource-intensive workplace-based self-management interventions that cater to both workers and employer stakeholders, to examine intervention implementation processes as well as effectiveness, and to draw on a common set of outcome measures to enable comparative analysis to better inform public health policy and practice.

Indexed as

Persons with DisabilitiesSelf-ManagementChronic DiseaseHealth PromotionHumansWorkplacedisabilitieslong-term conditionsoccupational healthrapid reviewself-managementworkplace

Identifiers

PMID39767553
PMCPMC11728185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.