Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39767532›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

A Machine Learning Classification Model for Gastrointestinal Health in Cancer Survivors: Roles of Telomere Length and Social Determinants of Health.

Claire J Han, Xia Ning, Christin E Burd, Fode Tounkara, Matthew F Kalady, Anne M Noonan, Diane Von Ah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Claire J HanCenter for Healthy Aging, Self-Management and Complex Care, College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6081-3378
Xia NingClinical Informatics and Implementation Science, Biomedical Informatics (BMI), College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Christin E BurdDepartments of Molecular Genetics, Cancer Biology, and Genetics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Fode TounkaraThe James: Cancer Treatment and Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Matthew F KaladyDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, The James: Cancer Treatment and Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Anne M NoonanGI Medical Oncology Section, The James: Cancer Treatment and Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8083-8492
Diane Von AhCenter for Healthy Aging, Self-Management and Complex Care, College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3189-1307

Funding

The Ohio State University Cancer Center, ONF RE03 no grant number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastrointestinal (GI) distress is prevalent and often persistent among cancer survivors, impacting their quality of life, nutrition, daily function, and mortality. GI health screening is crucial for preventing and managing this distress. However, accurate classification methods for GI health remain unexplored. We aimed to develop machine learning (ML) models to classify GI health status (better vs. worse) by incorporating biological aging and social determinants of health (SDOH) indicators in cancer survivors.

methodsWe included 645 adult cancer survivors from the 1999-2002 NHANES survey. Using training and test datasets, we employed six ML models to classify GI health conditions (better vs. worse). These models incorporated leukocyte telomere length (TL), SDOH, and demographic/clinical data.

resultsAmong the ML models, the random forest (RF) performed the best, achieving a high area under the curve (AUC = 0.98) in the training dataset. The gradient boosting machine (GBM) demonstrated excellent classification performance with a high AUC (0.80) in the test dataset. TL, several socio-economic factors, cancer risk behaviors (including lifestyle choices), and inflammatory markers were associated with GI health. The most significant input features for better GI health in our ML models were longer TL and an annual household income above the poverty level, followed by routine physical activity, low white blood cell counts, and food security.

conclusionsOur findings provide valuable insights into classifying and identifying risk factors related to GI health, including biological aging and SDOH indicators. To enhance model predictability, further longitudinal studies and external clinical validations are necessary.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsMachine LearningSocial Determinants of HealthAdultAgedFemaleGastrointestinal DiseasesHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysTelomerecancer survivorsgastrointestinal healthmachine learningsocial determinants of healthtelomere

Identifiers

PMID39767532
PMCPMC11675289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.