Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39767490›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Consensus in Action: Context-Specific Physical Activity Guidelines for Undergraduate Students at a South African University.

Chanté Johannes, Nicolette V Roman, Sunday O Onagbiye, Simone Titus, Lloyd L Leach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chanté JohannesDepartment of Sports, Recreation, and Exercise Science, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town 7535, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-6196-5434
Nicolette V RomanCentre for Interdisciplinary Studies of Children, Families and Society, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town 7535, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4506-437X
Sunday O OnagbiyeDepartment of Sports, Recreation, and Exercise Science, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town 7535, South Africa.
Simone TitusDepartment of Sports, Recreation, and Exercise Science, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town 7535, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-3599-8918
Lloyd L LeachDepartment of Sports, Recreation, and Exercise Science, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town 7535, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-5861-289X

Funding

Ernst and Ethel Trust NASasakawa Young Leaders Fellowship Fund (Sylff) from the Tokyo Foundation NAUniversity of the Western Cape: Deputy Vice-Chancellor Research and Innovation NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical inactivity among undergraduate university students has been considered a public health concern. To address this, researchers have utilized consensus workshop approaches to develop effective physical activity (PA) recommendations. However, the existing research has limitations: it is outdated, not context-specific to young adults, and does not account for psychosocial factors (such as mental health, motivation, and social support) that hinder or promote PA behavior, particularly in South Africa. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to engage with stakeholders to achieve a consensus on a set of context-specific guidelines to enhance the physical activities of undergraduate university students. Utilizing the Social Ecological Model, this study employed two online consensus workshops with 25 purposively selected stakeholders (Round 1 = 8 and Round 2 = 17). Stakeholders were divided into breakout rooms via the Google Meets feature, to discuss and brainstorm the guidelines, expressing their agreement or disagreement with the proposed names and descriptions. The consensus was considered achieved when the majority of stakeholder responses fell into the 'Agree with the guideline' category. An inductive thematic analysis approach was used to generate common themes, which were then coded via Atlas Ti. V8. Stakeholders reached a consensus on four categories and 32 guidelines, namely, PA (9 guidelines), mental health (7 guidelines), motivation (9 guidelines), and social support (7 guidelines). Each category, along with its respective set of guidelines, provides insights into the type of information undergraduate students require to enhance their PA participation. Using a consensus workshop facilitated the co-creation of context-specific guidelines to enhance the physical activities of undergraduate university students. This approach proved to be a valuable tool for fostering collaboration between academic staff and students.

Indexed as

ConsensusExerciseStudentsAdultFemaleGuidelines as TopicHumansMaleSouth AfricaUniversitiesYoung Adultconsensus workshopcontext-specificguidelinesphysical activitySouth Africaundergraduateuniversity students

Identifiers

PMID39767490
PMCPMC11675537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.