ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024
Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing a Community Suicide Database and Prevention Program in Diverse Tribal Communities.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Suicide is the second leading cause of death for American Indian youth, far surpassing the rates of suicide experienced by other races. The White Mountain Apache Tribe has made significant impacts on suicide risk by implementing a robust suicide prevention program which includes a community-led database and case management follow-ups. Due to the success of the program in preventing suicides, the White Mountain Apache team has worked with other tribal communities to adapt the program. We wanted to understand the factors that are most important to implementing and sustaining this model and how these factors compare with existing implementation science frameworks. We employed an adapted nominal group technique to compile facilitators and barriers to implementation of the suicide prevention model across settings with five partner teams. Two researchers independently coded the resulting list of facilitators and barriers using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (version 1.0) codebook. The final list of cross-site prioritized facilitators and barriers included 41 factors. Some factors did not match easily with the framework's constructs. The White Mountain Apache suicide prevention team noted that seven of the top prioritized factors are considerations they most try to emphasize to new communities working in suicide prevention. The factors fall into two key themes: staffing and tribal engagement. This finding affirms their focus when they conduct suicide prevention trainings with new communities and provides an opportunity for more structure and in-depth training in those two areas. Several factors could not be easily coded to the framework, especially around the sociocultural characteristics of suicide prevention work in Native communities. This contributes to the larger discussion in implementation science concerning the ways in which Indigenous approaches to public health differ from Western models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.