Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39767455›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Women's Empowerment and Health: A Narrative Review.

Marina Couva, Michael A Talias, Miranda Christou, Elpidoforos S Soteriades

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marina CouvaHealthcare Management Program, School of Economics and Management, Open University of Cyprus, Nicosia 2220, Cyprus.
Michael A TaliasHealthcare Management Program, School of Economics and Management, Open University of Cyprus, Nicosia 2220, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-1802-5586
Miranda ChristouDepartment of Education, University of Cyprus, Nicosia 2109, Cyprus.
Elpidoforos S SoteriadesHealthcare Management Program, School of Economics and Management, Open University of Cyprus, Nicosia 2220, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0001-6224-421X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Empowerment, the process by which a person is enabled to increase control over decisions concerning their life, is a multidimensional construct that has been extensively discussed by various disciplines for more than four decades. Several empowerment models have been presented, based on different approaches. This paper proposes a four-step model, based on individual and contextual awareness and advancement. Disparate factors may positively or negatively affect empowerment, including gender, race, culture, education, financial autonomy, socioeconomic status, family, neighborhood, religion, social cohesion, civic society, and political context. Empowerment has been extensively discussed in parallel with health promotion, since it is expected to positively affect health, both on the level of the individual and community, as well as in the context of the patient-healthcare professional relationship. Considering the position of women in patriarchal societies, where women may experience feelings of powerlessness, their social position and more importantly health may be adversely affected. Gender biases that were developed due to the marginalized position of women in different societies, coupled with paternalistic approaches of healthcare professionals, may significantly contribute to higher comorbidity, albeit longer life expectancy for women. Empowerment can therefore be a powerful tool for achieving equity in health and improving women's well-being.

Indexed as

EmpowermentWomen's HealthFemaleHumansPower, Psychologicalempowermentgender bias in healthpatriarchywomen

Identifiers

PMID39767455
PMCPMC11675888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.