Political Affiliation, Policy Measures, and Intention to Receive COVID-19 and Influenza Vaccines.

Isabel J Ricke, Alicen B Spaulding, Nickolas N Rajtar, Lauren Lundberg, Ruby H N Nguyen

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Isabel J RickeDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5798-7198

Alicen B SpauldingVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

Nickolas N RajtarDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3220-0950

Lauren LundbergDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-3026-9794

Ruby H N NguyenDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6598-8457

Funding

Minnesota Population Center Science and Technical CoreP2CHD041023 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI THERESA LOUISE OSYPUK · 2016 to 2026

$4.3M

J.B. Hawley Student Research Award from the Division of Epidemiology & Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health NANICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041023

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our study aimed to assess the impact of political affiliation, personal beliefs, and policy measures on the intention to receive routine COVID-19 and influenza vaccines in the coming year. A cross-sectional study of 1256 individuals at Minnesota State and County Fairs was conducted to assess their intention to receive COVID-19 booster and influenza vaccines in the coming year. The association between vaccine intention and political affiliation, belief in collective responsibility, and workplace/school vaccine requirements were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression. Vaccine intention in the coming year was high among our participants; 65% intended to receive both vaccines, 11% intended to receive only the influenza vaccine, 7% intended to receive only the COVID-19 vaccine, and 17% planned to receive neither. Political affiliation was strongly associated with the intention to receive both vaccines. Republicans were far more likely than Democrats to report plans to receive neither vaccine (aOR: 12.8; 95% CI: 6.2-26.6), or only the influenza vaccine in the coming year (aOR: 8.7; 95% CI: 4.2-17.9). Additionally, those who planned to receive both vaccines were significantly more likely to view vaccines as a collective responsibility. This study highlights the significant influence of political affiliation and beliefs in collective responsibility on vaccine intentions.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesIntentionPoliticsAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PolicyHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinnesotaVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesCOVID-19influenzapoliticsvaccine mandatesvaccines

Identifiers

PMID39767449

DOI10.3390/ijerph21121608

PMCPMC11675663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.