Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39767420›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake Among Women with Disabilities: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Study in Chile.

Sergio Jara-Rosales, Elena S Rotarou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sergio Jara-RosalesFaculty of Health Care Sciences, School of Midwifery, Universidad San Sebastián, Los Leones Campus, Santiago 7510157, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-6455-9864
Elena S RotarouANID Millennium Science Initiative Program, Millennium Nucleus Disability and Citizenship (DISCA), Project No. NCS2022_039, Santiago 7510157, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-4271-6184

Funding

ANID Millennium Science Initiative Program NCS2022_039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Papanicolaou (Pap) test is one of the most effective methods for cervical cancer screening. However, women with disabilities are less likely to be screened. The objective of this study is to determine whether there is a difference in Pap test utilisation between women with and without disabilities and to analyse the demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related characteristics associated with Pap test uptake among women with disabilities in Chile. Data from the 2022 National Socioeconomic Characterization Survey were analysed, and 71,989 women between 18 and 75 years of age were included. The dependent variable was Pap test utilisation, and the exposure variable was disability. We used logistic regressions to control for demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related covariates. The results showed that women with disabilities were less likely to undergo a Pap test compared to those without disabilities. Characteristics such as being married, being aged between 25 and 64 years, and having secondary or tertiary education increased the likelihood of Pap test utilisation. Conversely, being single, having received special education, and being inactive decreased these odds. Effective public health policies are needed that will increase Pap test utilisation for all population subgroups, including women with disabilities and, therefore, promote health equity.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerPapanicolaou TestPersons with DisabilitiesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAgedChileCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsYoung Adultcervical cancerequityPapanicolaou testscreeningwomen with disabilities

Identifiers

PMID39767420
PMCPMC11675201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.