Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39767320›Full record

ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A Systematic Review of Research Patterns and Trends in Early Childhood Education Teacher Well-Being from 1993 to 2023: A Trajectory Landscape.

Xinlin Li, Lutong Zhang, John Chi-Kin Lee, Junjun Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xinlin LiSchool of Foreign Languages and International Business, Guangdong Mechanical and Electrical Polytechnic, No. 2 Chanchushi Rd. East, Baiyun District, Guangzhou 510515, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5579-9871
Lutong ZhangCollege of Applied Technology, Yunnan Minzu University, No. 134, Yi Er Yi Street, Wuhua District, Kunming 650000, China.
John Chi-Kin LeeDepartment of Curriculum and Instruction, Academy for Educational Development and Innovation (AEDI), The Education University of Hong Kong, 10 Lo Ping Road, Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3235-0967
Junjun ChenDepartment of Education Policy and Leadership, The Education University of Hong Kong, 10 Lo Ping Road, Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1549-7991

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This current systematic review of research represents an attempt to unveil a descriptive picture of the evolving state of the body of knowledge about the well-being of early childhood education (ECE) teachers over 31 years from 1993 to 2023. In this review, 167 articles selected from SCOPUS are analysed using a descriptive quantitative approach. The analysis shows that quantitative research methods and empirical research are predominant in this field. Significant increases have been identified in qualitative and mixed-method research approaches in recent years, presaging a more balanced knowledge base in the near future. However, there has been little change in the scarcity of other research types. Meanwhile, the fragmented conceptualization of well-being, as well as its corresponding measurement, remains an outstanding issue. Overall, this review lays the groundwork for an understanding of the current trajectory of well-being research, especially with respect to ECE teachers, from a developmental perspective.

Indexed as

descriptive quantitative analysisearly childhood educationreview of researchteacher well-being

Identifiers

PMID39767320
PMCPMC11673697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.